Meritocracy

I’ve never been a Boy Scout in the literal sense of the word (though I have been referred to as a Boy Scout in the derogative, goody-goody sense). But I clicked through to this article on Wikipedia about discontinued merit badges.

The most amusing, to my mind:

* Stalker 1910-1911 (replaced by Stalking)
* Stalking 1911-1952 (replaced Stalker)

I’m sure that means something else, but it looks funny. Plus, I’ve noticed that the quality of stalkers has fallen off since 1952. And this despite the technology has only gotten better!

And why are the following no longer badges, anyway?

* Blacksmithing 1911-1952
* Carpentry 1911-1952
* Civics 1911-1946
* Consumer Buying 1975-1995
* Interpreting 1911-1952
* Invention 1911-1917
* Masonry 1911-1995
* Master-At-Arms 1910-1911
* Pigeon Raising 1933-1980
* Printing/Communication 1982-1987
* Rabbit Raising 1943-1993
* Wood Turning 1930-1952

Pigeon and Rabbit raising was probably discontinued because they learned the animals got on quite well by themselves, thank you very much.

And they cancelled the Consumer Buying in 1995? No wonder the stock market ran out of steam just a few years later.

It seems 1952 was a dark year for merit badges.

Book Log – The Best American Science and Nature Writing 2001

The Best American Science and Nature Writing 2001 Edited by Edward
O. Wilson

An interesting collection. I didn’t read every essay… there was one by
Jane Goodall that I just lost interest in.

Baby Steps was a refutation of the assertion that a child’s life is
determined by what happens to it between ages 0-3. Which is good, because
if that were true, I’d only have a week or so left to get Roan in line.

The Doubting Disease was a look at the prevalence of OCD behavior
in scientist types. Scarily, I kind of related, but not overmuch.

Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us was a great essay about various
future concepts, especially nanotechnology and the dangers it presents.
Very, very interesting thoughts.

The Best Clock in the World addressed topics I hinted at in a
microessay I wrote regarding clocks: their accuracy, what the passage of
time means, etc.. A neat discussion of the issues facing people who try
to keep time.

Book Log – The Borderlands of Science

The Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense by Michael
Shermer

I was kind of nonplussed by this book. He sets off to try and define the
difference between solid science, pseudoscience, and the gray area in
between. And near as I can tell, he doesn’t really come to any firm
conclusion.

Sure, he can rule out some pseudoscience fairly easily (Creationism is not
falsifiable, and therefore decidedly not science), but in the borderlands
(like SETI) he just says “Gray area, whatareyagonnado?”.

Plus, there was a lot of rehashing (or perhaps prehashing… I’m not sure
of the order) of the other books I’ve read by him.