I’m sadly nearing the end of reading Neal Stephenson’s Quicksilver (The Baroque Cycle, Vol. 1). It makes me somewhat sad to near the end of a great book, but I am heartened by the fact that there are two more volumes to come, and I saw The Confusion (The Baroque Cycle, Vol. 2) in a bookstore display window in the airport last night.
While Cyptonomicon still tops the list of my all-time favorite books, Quicksilver is humbling in its breathtaking richness of detail, history and compelling storyline and characters. Every so often I have to set the book down and marvel at the amount of research that must have gone into this rather large tome.
I wonder if it is harder to create an entire world filled with rich history (say, The Lord of the Rings) or to meticulously research the real world and weave a fascinating story into it.
It is not so very often that I am reading an action sequence in a book and I am actually overcome with a rush of adrenaline, especially if I am sitting in a cramped airplane seat next to someone who is large enough to have justifiably purchased two seats, but didn’t. Such was the case when I read a sand-sailer action sequence. A sand-sailer (and I hadn’t heard of it) is basically a large skateboard with a sail on it, which is used on beaches. In the novel, William of Orange rides one every morning, and there’s a great sequence with horses, sand-sailers, pirates, muskets and stuff. Woo. I was thinking it would be worth making the book into a movie, if just for that sequence.
Woo.
I wonder if it is harder to create an entire world filled with rich history (say, The Lord of the Rings) or to meticulously research the real world and weave a fascinating story into it.
The former. But the latter is pretty impressive too.
Really, you think so? I would have guessed the latter to be harder.
When you’re creating a fictional world, you’re starting from scratch and adding on pieces as you go along. When telling a story meshed with real history, you have to figure out how the pieces of your story will fit into a puzzle that’s already been laid out.
That’s just it. When you start from scratch you have to create all the big piece of history and make them all fit together. In the latter case they already fit together.
I don’t think most people create the history all at once (though Tolkien more or less did, right?) I’m thinking that most authors just make up the history as they go along, and try not to contradict themselves too much along the way.
I was thinking mainly about Tolkien.
Who, by the way, dislikes, because he is a Philistine.
Sounds like a fun book. I’m going to have to work that into my queue. I love fiction pieces that take you back in time in history.
If you haven’t read it already, put Cryptonomicon at the head of your queue. As a mathematical-type with an interest in woven-historical-fiction, you will have no choice but to proclaim it as your favorite book ever.
Much better than anything that hack Tolkien ever wrote.