Book Log – The Fabulous Riverboat

The Fabulous Riverboat: Book 2 of the Riverworld Saga by Philip Jose’ Farmer

The second book was fine, but there was not a lot addressed regarding What Is Going On with the Riverworld. (Why is everyone who lived on earth reincarnated along a hugely long river?)

This one features Mark Twain in his efforts to build a riverboat to make it to the headwaters of the River and solve some mysteries.

Among the things I found strange was the people’s ability to build some fairly extensive technology from raw materials, including, most amazingly, video screens.

An okay read.

—–
On the Reading Table: Nothing! Arg!

Book Log – “What Do _You_ Care What Other People Think?”

“What Do You Care What Other People Think?” (Further Adventures
of a Curious Character
by Richard P. Feynman

The first half of this book is more adventures akin to the first Curious
Character book. Sad and witty in equal parts.

The second half recounts his adventures as a member of the
Challenger disaster investigatory commission. This was
fascinating. I hadn’t really followed the story in detail… I had
vaguely heard of the infamous “failed o-ring”.

But Feynman’s account from within the investigation is very disturbing.
You see a lot of the same bureaucracy going on that appears in other
technical companies of much less importance (no lives at stake).

I went back a re-read the results of the Columbia disaster
investigation and saw those findings in a sadder light after having read
Feynman’s actual appendix to the Challenger report, which he had to
fight so hard to have included. There simply could not have been a
clearer warning of exactly what lead to the Columbia disaster:
complacency over failure. “Well, yes, the design didn’t work the way we
liked, and could fail, but it didn’t last time, so we’re good to go!”

had said in a prior post or comment that the
whole shuttle system should be mothballed. At the time I read his
comment, I thought that was extreme. But now I’m of the same mind.
Feynman’s investigation showed that the shuttle was not designed following
the good practices used in comparable endeavors like airplanes. It’s
filled with hardware bugs (though Feynman praises the software
development).

Scrap it, start over, do it right. Or let private industry do so.

In the meantime, keep sending those cool Mars images.

Book Log – To Your Scattered Bodies Go

To Your Scattered Bodies Go (Riverworld Series Book 1) by Philip Jose’ Farmer

Scenario: You’re dead. But you wake up naked next to a bunch of other people, next to a river, a plain, and impassable mountain ranges on either side. There’s a mushroom that provides food, smokes, and clothing. As far as you can tell, everyone who ever lived has also appeared next to this extremely long river. Also, everyone is 25 years old or younger.

What’s up with that?

told me of this series many years ago, but I just got around to borrowing it from him (it’s never available in a bookstore when I think to browse for it). It’s a good read.

I see from the bio that Philip Jose’ Farmer was born in 1918 in Terre Haute, IN, which is 5 years after and 20 miles from the time and place when my grandfather, Floyd Lucas, was born. I wonder if they met at a barn dance.

I’ve got Book 2 queued up. says the series’ conventions kind of go off the rails after that.

Book Log – Interface

Interface by Neal Stephenson and J. Frederick George

Originally published under the name Stephen Bury, they rereleased this and The Cobweb under Neal’s real name and that of his co-writer, a historian named J. Frederick.

This was written about five years before Cryptonomicon. The plot is not as tight, but the writing is still very engaging. It’s kind of a “missing link” between his hard-core science fiction like Snow Crash and his only-vaguely science fiction works, like Cryptonomicon.

The plot revolves around a presidential campaign, a secret society called the Network, and chips implanted in brains. Good fun, a worthy read.

I wonder why he published it under a pseudonym?


On the bookstand:
To Your Scattered Bodies Go (Riverworld Vol. 1) by Philip Jose’ Farmer
What Do You Care What Other People Think? (Further Adventures of a Curious Character) by Richard Feynman

Book Log – Our Endangered Values

Our Endangered Values: America’s Moral Crisis by Jimmy Carter

“It is much easier and more convenient to focus on sins of which we are
not known to be guilty.” -Jimmy Carter, on the Christian Right’s attacks
on homosexuality to the exclusion of other topics closer to home, like
adultery and divorce.

Jimmy simply savages the current administration in this book. I’ll
bet he doesn’t get invited to many of their parties.

Endangered Values is an overview of Carter’s worries on America’s
current trajectory in several realms, kind of an extended opinion piece.
He warns in the introduction he’s going to be mixing politics and
religion, but that he does so as a private citizen.

Given that his motivations are fairly different than mine (his reasoning
comes from his religious beliefs), we both end up at the same conclusions
most of the time. He’s a good guy.

I am wary, however, when people get too “Good Old Days” on me. I question
his assertion that the country is more sharply divided along partisan
lines than they used to be in his day. I don’t know for sure… I wasn’t
even remotely clued in to politics before the mid-90’s, to be honest. To
me, it was always just a bunch of people in suits squabbling with each
other. But I thought people got up in arms on both sides of that Vietnam
thing, and perhaps Reagan raised some hackles here and there.

At any rate, it’s a fine little opinion piece, and he scored points with
me for quoting both Warren Buffett and Stephen Jay Gould.

Book Log – Don’t Know Much About The Bible (re-read)

Don’t Know Much About the Bible: Everything You Need to Know About the
Good Book but Never Learned
by Kenneth C. Davis

This is a re-read.

Recently, I was asked by my sister-in-law to be the godfather to my
nephew, Frankie Richie (or Frichie, as I like to call him). There was
some consternation about the request… I’m notorious on that side of the
family for my nontheism. I think mostly they were worried I would be
offended; It certainly isn’t because of concern that I wouldn’t step up to
guiding the boy spiritually. I don’t see any of the other kids’
godparents giving Bible lessons.

But I’m taking this seriously. While I’m going to let the kid make his
own decisions about what he believes, I will certainly make sure he’s got
all the data at hand.

This book is a great read. It really brings out the interesting thoughts,
quandries, contradictions, and interpretations of the bible. It talks
about how it was collected, what was left out, when everything was written
and by whom (as far as we know at this point, anyway).

I’d like to learn more about the Gnostic Gospels and how they fit in…
how credible were they as “authentic” records of the times and why were
they left out? Don’t Know Much documents the split of the early
church, and how much of Paul and other’s writings are condemnations of the
Gnostic take on Christianity. But in retrospect, are the Gnostic Gospels
just as valid as the canonized ones? Had Paul not been such a good
marketing director, would we be singing hymns about hot Mary-on-Jesus
action?

Also, I’d love to have a conversation with a fundamentalist and find out
how they rectify the contradictions in the Bible. I mean, just a few
pages into Genesis, there’s already conflicting accounts going on. The
Gospels could have used a committee meeting to make sure they were all on
the same page as well. Often with any debate, there are grey areas and
both sides make good points, but I don’t see how a fundamentalist has a
leg to stand on.

Book Log – Freakanomics

Freakanomics by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner

I’m probably one of the last people in america to read this book.

I read it this past weekend while we were up visiting my parents in
Kentucky. I had given it to my father for Christmas and he had spoken
glowingly of it; This made it significant, because he is one difficult
person to shop for.

It’s certainly a short read, as evidenced by the fact that I read it in
bits and pieces between Friday morning and Saturday night.

It’s an interesting tome. Most of the critiques of this book seem to
center around a lack of rigor or failure to demonstrate in detail the
analysis behind the assertions. But given that it’s written as a “pop
economics” book for mass appeal, this doesn’t really surprise or bother me
overmuch.

While I wouldn’t take any of the conclusions as gospel truth, it’s got a
bunch of fun stuff to think about, which is probably all it was meant to
be.

Book Log – ‘Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman!’

“Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman!” (Adventures of a Curious
Character)
by Richard P. Feynman

Delightful book. Stories from a wacky Manhattan Project physicist.

In the beginning I was sort of non-plussed… early stories from his
childhood that were not so amazing because they were comparable to stories
I or people I know could tell. Ho-hum, I ain’t no brilliant physicist.
But people I respect highly recommended this book, so…

Later he emerges as an amazing man who got himself into interesting
adventures, largely through extreme curiosity and bravado and often with
famous historical figures.

Also, a womanizer. There’s something darkly funny about a brilliant
physicist who expends a lot of energy trying to score with show girls
(and, by his account, succeeding).

Highly recommended for just about anyone.


Currently Reading:
The Best American Essays 2003

Book Log – The Moon is a Harsh Mistress

The Moon is a Harsh Mistress by Robert A. Heinlein

Was good read. Written in Luna dialect. Was story about dinkum thinkum
that could talk-talk like regular cobber. Started revolution for Free
Luna with three not-stupids.

Or, put another way, it’s the story of a computer that gained sentience
and helped three decent humans start a revolution to overthrow the
oppressive Lunar Authority.

It’s a good example of the genre.

What’s interesting is that and I started to write a play
set on Mars many years ago. In a draft I wrote of the first scene, I
inserted bits about alternative lifestyles that I thought would be more
prevalent in a society more or less cut off from the main society on
Earth. hated it and removed the bits.

But apparently Mr. Heinlein (“The greatest science fiction writer of the
modern age” according to the jacket cover) was on my side, because the
“marriages” on this fictional Luna are mostly of an alternative sort, some
what necessitated by the 2:1 male to female ratio there.

The main character was a member of a “line” marriage that had been in
existance for some time. (I think he said 100 years, which, given that
the story takes place in 2075, meant that Mr. Heinlein felt we would have
colonized the moon by 1975. The book was written in 1966.) A line
marriage starts basically with a couple, who then “opts” in a slightly
younger person, so now there are three spouses. Then later, another
younger person is added, and so on, so that the average age of the
marriage stays around 35.

I casually collect alternate marriage formats because I’ve always felt
that the answer to this “marriage=man+woman” controversy is to provide as
many legal social contract types as there are business types. You can
form a business as an s-corporation, c-corporation, limited liability
partnership, limited liability corporation, sole proprietership, general
partnership, a holding company with subsidiaries, etc., but you only get
one type of marriage contract1. Backwards, if you ask me.

So, now having completed a novel by the “greatest science fiction writer
of the modern age,” I turn next to Guardian I Defender of Peace by
what I assume will be the second greatest science fiction writer of the
modern age.

1 It should be noted for critical parties reading
(hi sweetie!) that I’m perfectly happy with my current marriage contract
and would not advocate a different type, but I’m all about freedom of
choice. In much the same way I believe all drugs should be legal but
would not partake myself.