The Theory of Everything by Stephen W. Hawking
I understood maybe 50% of that. Maybe.
In this series of lectures, first published in 1996, Stephen Hawking tries to ‘splain It All to us. From the early history of universe theories (Ptolemy, Copernicus, Newton, etc.) all the way up to String Theory.
I was fine with stuff up until he started talking about finite space-time with no boundaries, “like the surface of the Earth, but with two more dimensions”. I understand the words, but I can’t get a mental picture of what that actually means practically speaking. Throw in “imaginary time”, and I’m pretty much down for the third time.
I note he says that by the “end of the century”, we should know whether String Theory is worth anything. That is, by 2000.
If Wikipedia is any gauge, String Theory does not (or should not) really enjoy the status of a full blown Scientific Theory, as it is not falsifiable in the foreseeable future until we can do some testing using equipment on a scale of the solar system. Many scientists say it more accurately qualifies as a “mathematic framework”. Whatever that means.
All in all an O.K., albeit challenging, read.
String theory is a fascinating topic, but you’re right on the mathematical framework part. Neil deGrasse Tyson is a vocal opponent of string theory for the very reason of its un-testability, at least at present.
I’ve read some of Brian Greene’s work, and though he tries to make it as comprehensible as he can, there are still chunks of it that soar way over my head.
Perhaps we’ll learn the truth…in the year 2000.
Y’know, I’ll be that Y2K bug screwed up String Theory.