On Money

Sometimes, I think it would have been fun to be an economist. Then I blink my eyes, shake my head a bit, and the feeling passes.

But my interest in the mathematics behind sustainable incomes and considering the big picture economy doesn’t fade.

So, there have been two articles in the past few weeks that caught my eye. One on IKEA’s U.S. plant woes, and the other on a “realistic wage“, i.e. the minimum salary to live in a sustainable way and be able to plan for retirement, etc.

IKEA’s $8/hour starting wage would be sufficient for a part time job for the second earner in a two income household with no kids and renting (31.5 hours a week, 50 weeks a year). To sustain a single person on their own, the worker would need to work 75 hours a week, 50 weeks a year (less if they get higher pay for the overtime). In Sweden, the minimum wage is $19/hour, with 5 weeks paid vacation.

New York Times

Essentially, anyone making less than $15/hour1 is going to be dependent on someone else in order to make a sustainable living, get healthcare, plan for retirement. Add a kid into the mix, and the number goes up to $23/hour.

These numbers are based on the New York Times table, developed from the report by the Wider Opportunities for Women and Department of Health and Human Services.

So what happens in America if we take these numbers as real, and seek to improve the minimum wage? As labor costs go up, so do the cost of goods and services. As the cost of goods and services rise, the “reality wage” goes up. If the minimum wage is increased to counter that… is there a unstable feedback loop happening, or does the system stabilize?

If we purchase fewer goods and services to counter the rise in costs, does the economy take a nose dive? Or is the cost of goods and services kept in check by the lowering of the “wages” of the upper classes, thereby closing the income gap that has reportedly been growing over the last twenty years? (Is there enough money being earned at the top such that “re-distributing” some of it could make a meaningful difference at the bottom?)

It is easy to see why one might want to leave it to the Invisible Hand to set minimum wages… messing about with a complex system can have very undesirable results.

On the other hand… $8/hour just ain’t enough. The Invisible Hand is not necessarily wise, or correct.

__
1This is using my 50 weeks/40 hours, no paid vacation model.

ING! IIIIIIIING!

Okay, I don’t even have the energy to relay the Whole Big Thing with ING but I’d like to reiterate…

Boo, ING Direct, Boo!

The nice man on the phone says we should have our checking account back in action tomorrow. Or, possibly, Thursday.

BOOO!

Boo ING Direct

I’m working off some bad financial karma this week, I guess.

We’ve had a situation during our transition from Netbank to ING Direct where for the last week, we’ve had no checking account available to us to pay bills. The one that has the money (ING Direct) is locked because I forgot about a $18.00 check written to the Boy Scouts back in September that just got cashed on the old Netbank account right before a Netbank-ING Direct transfer went through for the last of the cash in the Netbank account.

The upshot of which is that it triggered some automated-fraud-detection thingy at ING Direct (even though it’s essentially an intra bank transfer since they ARE Netbank now), and they locked the only checking account we have available for an undetermined number of days, it’s been 5 so far. No, they can’t tell me when it will be available. No, there’s no way to get it unlocked so I can pay my mortgage. No, there’s no one I can talk to about this. No, they have no ideas about how to get the money in my savings account transferred out to pay the mortgage on time. No, they simply can not help me. They are awfully sorry, though. Don’t I have some other checking account at another bank I could use?

Not yet, no. But soon.

Luckily, I called the mortgage company, and they were able to do a wire transfer out of our ING Direct savings account to cover the payment today. Whew.

So, in summary, Boo, ING Direct, boo.

R.I.P. Netbank

Netbank’s accounts (including ours) were acquired by INGDirect a few days ago. It was sinking fast, and declared bankruptcy.

We had all but one of our accounts with Netbank (including my business account), the other one was with INGDirect.

So… effortless consolidation!

But the thing about INGDirect is that they don’t like you to send in deposits. They prefer you deposit money in another bank, and electronically transfer it in, sortof a bank parasite. Previously, my other bank was Netbank so… what shall happen? Shall I be forced to open an account with some brick and mortar monstrosity? Ye GADS!

The one point of pride in this is that I analyzed the financials of Netbank in 2000 and saw some subtle red flags that prevented me from investing. It’s good to include our averted-disasters in with our clean wins in the investing world.